Judging a Writing Contest

January 9, 2011
Reading entries of the James River Writers Best Unpublished Novel contest.

Reading entries of the James River Writers Best Unpublished Novel contest.

Last year, I had been invited to enter the annual James River Writers, “Best Unpublished Novel” contest. I had strongly considered submitting my manuscript, but I knew what trusted friends confirmed: it wasn’t ready for the looming deadline. A day or so after deciding not to enter, I was then invited to judge the same contest. This was by far the better choice and I’m glad that it worked out this way.

I had never judged a contest and I looked forward to the experience. It turned out to be a wonderful way to spend a Saturday, sweetened by the location. A JRW member lent out her delightful home, situated on the James River. Every bit of it had character, charm and warmth.

I would guess that some two dozen people came and went throughout the day to help go through the 70+ entries. Judging involved reading the 50 submitted pages and filling out a form at the end. Judges score on elements ranging from basic spelling and grammar to voice, dialogue, plot and so on.

Generally a slow reader, I had finished five by the time we wrapped up for the day. I won’t get into the details of what I had read, but there was one that I hope to see become a finalist.

Good luck to all those  who entered!

Bad Writing Documentary

December 11, 2010

I came across a trailer for a documentary titled, Bad Writing. Have you seen it? What did you think? I usually don’t see documentaries.

Auras and Synaesthesia

November 20, 2010

New Scientist has an article about a synaesthete who sees colors surrounding people based on emotions.

Writing Show: Social Media Do’s and Don’ts

September 13, 2010

This should have gone up sooner. Anyway, it was  a packed attendance at last month’s Writing Show. Questions came up almost immediately, especially regarding Twitter, which was highly recommended by the panelists. Below is my review, published in the James River Writers newsletter, Get Your Word On. I’ll add that the discussion was mostly geared around Twitter, Facebook, and blogging, but that there are many other social networking opportunities. Consider MeetUp, Goodreads and LinkedIn. What do you think?

Social media do’s and don’ts for the smart writer

Suppose you have a finished manuscript, a connected agent and a savvy editor. Then all that’s left is to enjoy the launch party and take a long deserved vacation, right? Sorry, but this is no time to relax. It’s time to market your masterpiece, a challenging task that an Internet presence makes easier, said the panelists at the August Writing Show.

Kelly Justice of Fountain Books led the discussion before an audience brimming with questions. What is Twitter? Should I have a separate FaceBook account for my book? How can I make money on my blog? Editor Ron Hogan, “Book Lady” Rebecca Schinsky, and writer Joe Wallace provided the answers with humor, personal stories and cautionary tales.

Twitter is the little birdie telling people about the great novel that was just released. Simple and versatile, Twitter is a fun platform way to network 140 characters at a time. Wallace credits it for his success. Schinsky called Twitter the great equalizer for the way it puts you in immediate contact with other writers at all levels of fame.

Blogs and online journals  — two other popular ways to build an audience — are tools Schinsky knows well. Her blog’s success attracts not only paying advertisers, it also allows her to promote authors, booksellers and others in the industry. Reciprocity is key to all forms of social media: The more you give of yourself, the more you get in return.

Facebook falls between blogging and tweeting. It allows for quick communication and network building like Twitter, while being a central place for people to learn more about you in the manner of a blog.

Finished Zen and Art of Motorcycle Maintenance

September 9, 2010
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance by Robert Pirsig

Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance by Robert Pirsig

Generally I liked Robert Pirsig’s Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, but for the ending and a few other moments. For this reason, please be warned that I will be covering this. And hopefully I am representing the philosophical elements properly.

The novel has been widely celebrated and called life-changing. This may be due to, as Pirsig himself states in the Afterword of my edition, the book tapping into the underlying mood of the culture of that time. I was born after its release in 1974, so I, unable to connect to the book in that way, do not find it so profound. Not to diminish Pirsig’s work at all. It just didn’t reach me that way.

The point of view is first person (and second in a sense). Our unnamed protagonist talks to the reader, relating his Chautauqua, his name for this meaningful story. The protagonist is sympathetic, a man who seems content, attuned to his surroundings while trying to appreciate all the moments of life. He’s on a journey with his 12-year-old son, Chris. They travel on a motorcycle from Minnesota to the California coast. All the while a wolf stalks them at the periphery, then closes in towards them at the end.

It would appear that father and son have a healthy relationship. Agreeing to accompany your dad, clung to his back on a cycle for thousands of miles, camping out and hiking canyons, would require this. But one of the reasons I did not like the ending is that it puts a lie to that assumption.

Pirsig writes in an enviably clear and simple style. The book is an easy read and I especially enjoyed the beginning. I like how he compared riding in a car and riding on a motorcycle. He described the former as being an observer, the window both framing the world and removing you from it, while being on the cycle you are a participant, you’re in the middle of it all. You can see above, around and below, feel the wind, feel the road. It almost makes me want to buy a bike and go cross country (but I know I’d not like the heat, cold, bugs, rain…).

Pirsig has practical advice when discussing motorcycle riding and repair. It comes down to preparation and rolling with the unexpected. It’s attitude as much, if not more, than skill.

Unfortunately, as he book progresses, we see less of the road, the journey, the relationship, till they are isolated paragraphs interspersed with the Chatauqua, which to me was less engaging. Throughout, we are given this sense that something is amiss. Chris frequently complains of stomach pains and loss of appetite, the protagonist has snatches of memory as though he had been on this road before. Bad dreams haunt his nights.

As the pair travel through the Dakotas into Montana, then Idaho and Oregon beyond, the protagonist sets about to explain through his Chautauqua that quality, value, Buddha can be found in everything, from flower petals to circuit boards. He’s trying to remove the boundaries between science and aesthetics, between something that’s mass-manufactured and hand-crafted. So much of the novel is investigating these dichotomies in order to discern if they are real or illusionary and the very nature of Quality — big Q.

Our hero introduces Phaedrus, a contemporary philosopher whom he once knew. Using the writings of Phaedrus and his own recall, the protagonist attempts to break down Western philosophy into its constituent parts, as one would disassemble a motorcycle with great care, trying to understand why the pieces fit together the way they do. The first dichotomy Phaedrus described was classic and romantic. These are general modes of appreciating forms. Those with a classic mindset would appreciate the schematics of a motorcycle, the lists of parts, tolerances and specifications, units of measure, and so on. The romantic wouldn’t care for any of that and instead would appreciate the appearance of the bike, its colors, curves, feel of the handlebar grips, sound of the engine. Extrapolated out, you have other pairs of dichotomies that are similar: empirical versus a priori science; male/female, rational/emotional, material/spiritual.

All this leads to the central question Phaedrus and our protagonist wrestle with. What is Quality? What mode does it belong to? If Quality is empirical, then everyone would recognize it equally. Everyone can agree on the weight of a particular motorcycle, the type of engine, the number of wheels. All observable. But not everyone would agree on the particular motorcycle’s quality.

If Quality is entirely subjective, then the definition becomes too fluid to have value. Even an individual has to decide for himself on the quality of the motorcycle. By what measure? What is best?

Phaedrus believes that Quality is neither one, but both together. At first he thinks it arises when the classic and romantic meet, but really it precedes them. It’s from Quality that the two split. Quality is one. Ultimately this epiphany leads to Phaedrus having a psychotic break.

As it turns out, Phaedrus is our protagonist. Our protagonist had thought he put that demon away for good, but he was there all along, stalking him and his son this whole journey. At the end, Chris is no longer having fun and demands that they go home. Father is willing to send Chris home, but he will go on, perhaps to never see Chris again. Further, he insists that Chris’s ailments are all in his head. Perhaps this tells of a fear that father has for his son, that his son may have inherited his predisposition to mental instability.

What happens next is what threw me, and not in a way I liked. Phaedrus devours our protagonist. Our hero dies in that Phaedrus reasserts himself. Chris picks up on it instantly, perhaps by tone of voice or body language, and is not dismayed or scared, but relieved and happy. Now he doesn’t want to go home, he wants to stay with Phaedrus and continue their journey. Apparently, Chris had preferred the unstable, monomaniac Phaedrus rather than the father we came to like throughout the book? Since we don’t have access to Chris’s thoughts, we can only guess that all this time he had been pining for his old father and had secretly waited for him to reappear.

It was a jarring ending for me. What do you think?

Omnivoracious: Best Sci-Fi of the Year So Far

September 8, 2010

Came upon a post in Omnivoracious (an Amazon blog) about its picks for best sci-fi and fantasy novels for 2010 (thus far).  Nine titles are listed with descriptions. Of these, the one I may pick up is How to Live in a Science Fictional Universe by Charles Yu. Have you read any of them? What do you think?

Started Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance

August 2, 2010
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance by Robert Pirsig

Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance by Robert Pirsig

I had intended to read this novel since college. I aim to put it behind me finally. I don’t know much about it other than what’s on the back cover. A road trip taken by a father and son and discovering what really matters. (always a good thing, right?)

Finished Foucault’s Pendulum

August 2, 2010
Foucault's Pendulum by Umberto Eco

Foucault's Pendulum by Umberto Eco

Umberto Eco is a geek. A professor of semiotics, Eco certainly researched every symbol and sign of Middle Eastern and Western occult societies for his novel, Foucault’s Pendulum. Then he disgorged them over the course of 600 pages with the detail and admiration of one enamored of the subject matter. Like a character from the tv show, Big Bang Theory, he has the most esoteric minutiae at the ready. This trait can be illuminating to some readers while leaving others bewildered.

The story centers on three Italian editors working for a vanity press. Casaubon, Belbo and Diotallevi read countless manuscripts submitted by crackpots who claim to have discovered the true secret of the Knights Templar or other groups imputed with great power and nefarious agendas. Then one day a Colonel Ardenti comes to their office, claiming to have unearthed proof of a plot devised by the Templars. Inspired, the three devise a story to explain the secret history of the world, incorporating Ardenti’s discovery and the anything else they can lay their hands on.

Like a melange made with whatever ingredients can be had in the pantry of their collective knowledge, the trio throw in Bacon, the Masons, the Jesuits, the Rosicrucians, Cabalists and more. The recipe is called the Plan and those who find out its secret will have untold power. Unfortunately, the Plan is real — real enough that people like Ardenti go missing and the lives of the three editors are imperiled.

The complexity of the novel is breathtaking and I don’t know how Eco had kept it all straight. I can imagine it had been fun to conceive and write the story. It is the ultimate conspiracy theory because it contains all the conspiracy theories threaded together. But so much of the novel, perhaps all but the last 150 pages, are about conceiving the Plan. There isn’t much of a story when danger comes. Less so a thriller and more of a philosophical exercise, I think much of it is over my head. I can see that Eco is criticizing conspiracy theorists in general. How connections that don’t exist are tenuously joined by the theorist because he wants there to be. It’s an easy game to play, linking events or people together by numerology or shared initials or geography. Like psychics who throw out enough vague words that can mean anything to anyone, letting the listener fill in the rest.

Have you read it? What do you think?

Plot versus Character Driven Story

July 21, 2010

Apropos my recent writing group meeting, I had described my novel in progress as character-driven. But was that accurate? So let’s see. The reason I consider it so is because my approach is take great characters and throw them together and write the story that emerges, rather than begin with a plot and creating characters to suit the needs of the story’s course.

I feel my characters are fully formed and not props to be summoned when needed and discarded soon after. They have their own lives, motivations, personalities. If I’m successful to presenting them to the reader, does that make the novel character-driven? Or is there some other definition? Then what is plot-driven? Is one better than the other?

What do you think? Which do you prefer reading and/or writing?

Trailer: Vampires Suck

July 8, 2010

A trailer for a parody of the Twilight movies:

Related: RiffTrax of Twilight.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.